A Conversation with Michelle Daniel Jones

October 20th 2021



For the first seminar in our series, we were honoured to be joined by Michelle Daniel Jones, a fourth year doctoral student at NYU, who discussed her work as part of the Indiana Women’s Prison History project. This collaborative project sees incarcerated scholars at Indiana Women’s Prison (IWP), alongside fellow historians Elizabeth Nelson and Kelsey Kauffman, research the history of the first fifteen years of that institution, founded in 1873, which is forthcoming in a New Press volume.


As part of this project, researchers employ an innovative methodology, which Michelle described as “embodied observations” that centred participants’ personal experiences of carceral institutions when asking questions about and analysing the nineteenth-century realities of incarceration. This strategy meant approaching primary archival material from multiple viewpoints, giving rise to “meta-discussions” that traversed statistical data from prison registers and documentary evidence of daily life at IWP, in addition to lived experiences within that institution in the twenty-first century. Michelle and fellow scholars privileged incarcerated women’s voices, starting from the assumption of believing the extant testimony of nineteenth-century internees, and bearing witness to their experiences. In so doing, the project proves the methodological imperative of infusing the ethos of the #MeToo movement into historical practice, centring the experiences of criminalised women, who historically have been denied their truth.

Through this innovative and collaborative methodological approach, the IWP History Project has challenged received narratives of nineteenth-century women’s prison reform that focused on the benevolence of white, middle-upper class, religious female reformers. By consulting new archival material--namely an 1881 state investigation into alleged abuses at the facility perpetrated by its founders--in addition to meta-discussions amongst the scholars, the group learned of the “depth and breadth” of gendered physical, economic, and sexual violence in the nineteenth-century institution. While focusing on the stories of women who endured and survived these carceral regimes, the project has upended the “feel good” narratives of prison reform, which speaks to scholarship on gender, race, and prisons in this period, as well as posing broader questions about the aims and means of carceral reform today.


During the seminar, Daniel Jones shared the realities and the challenges posed by completing historical research while incarcerated, including delays in accessing primary and secondary material, relying on other researchers to conduct in-person archival research, and financial ramifications of this (challenges described in detail in this piece for the American Historical Association’s blog).

To directly donate or support the work of the IWP project, please: